318
Page Approval Function
in progress
Anna Seewaldt
Such a funtion is very important if you let students and internship users do articles or just new guys who maybe got something wrong. We would appriciate it a lot.
E
Evan
Adding an approval feature to the wiki system is crucial from a company perspective. I also believe that different categories of articles should have different approvers. Articles within a specific category should be assigned to members of a particular user group for review.
Consider this scenario: It wouldn't make sense for documents created by the sales team to be reviewed by the security department. I hope that the article approval process can be streamlined to ensure the right individuals are assigned for review. Furthermore, it's important that only administrators have the authority to configure these assignment relationships; authors should not have the freedom to choose their own reviewers.
T
Timotheos Samartzidis
We need to improve our wikis, especially the ones that are used in regulated areas. A good step forward would be to set up an approval process that meets FDA 21 CFR Part 11 regulations.
This process will allow our administrators to create approval stages just like the system used by Comala (https://docs.comalatech.com/space/CDML/6753945277/Switch+between+draft+and+published).
We should also use electronic signatures and keep a history of all changes made in the wiki. I believe some of these features are already in place, so it would be great to integrate them fully into the new approval process.
Nicolas Giard
Merged in a post:
Content moderation by admins
K
Kiran
Content vandalism is a serious issue for wiki admins.
Please add content moderation feature that allows admins/moderators to review and approve edits. Lack of this feature severely limits deployment of wiki.js on large open yet moderated projects.
I'm in love with wiki.js' modern look and features. But due to vandalism concerns I'll have to consider another wiki software. :-(
Jason
This appears to be a duplicate of: https://js.wiki/feedback/p/page-approval-function
Marc Bollmann
I started a github discussion about possible implementation: https://github.com/requarks/wiki/discussions/5614
Shiftcloud Consultant
Hello everyone,
we too, would be in need of this feature. The whole of Germany would need this feature, because we are so very strict on hierachies and approvals and whatnot (who isn't). If there is anything my company can do to help, i.e. Donation or lending a Developer, please let me know, many regards,
Stephan from Shiftcloud
Félicien Moreau
Shiftcloud Consultant: https://docs.requarks.io/en/releases/about#how-can-i-help
Shiftcloud Consultant
Félicien Moreau: https://github.com/requarks/wiki/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+approval
Marc von Renteln
Perhaps this could be handled by permissions. At least if review is not mandatory. But here is a missing peace in the review workflow of WikiJS:
When a moderator (role that can create and edit pages) posts a page for later (a given date) this page is not shown to others. If a QA (another role that can edit pages) likes to review the page he/she cannot see it. There is no config parameter for roles to see unpublished pages.
Francisco Capelo
Very happy to see this feature in progress. Hope to have it soon. Thank you for all the help with this. :)
М
Михаил Тригуб
It just became critical to install wiki.js or buy some wiki which has this function on board. Hurry up please
Load More
→